Friday, September 13, 2013

Last week! - week 11


I wasn’t able to open the recording this week but its finally come, the end of the semester. I thought that it flew by and I learned a lot. I think that I learned more about running a business and marketing then all of my classes so far. I thought that it was interesting actually being given a company to market. I learned about timing of decisions as well as when a good time to alter things such as pricing or sales force or advertising budget. I would have never thought that all of this altering of a marketing plan or strategy would take place. However, it was done over the course of ten years so if I think about how much times have changed over the past ten years, I can see how this is relevant. That might have been the most important thing that I took out of the Pharmasim experience. There are infinite amount of changes that could occur in the market at any time. Some can propel a product to success and another can decline it.

For this week for my advice memo I named the critical success factors for Allstar as included symptom relief, relationships with channels, relationships with doctors, brand awareness, and sales force. In other words, what the customer wants most is for their symptoms to be treated, first and foremost. They first need to be convinced that the product will help them and the context of the advertising message should always be evaluated for improvement. Once the customer tries the product and experiences its effectiveness they can become loyal customers. Loyal customers will build up the brand awareness of a product and be able to pass on the word to friends and family to try it. Dispersing the product throughout the right channels is very important too as well as maintaining shelf space in comparison with competitors. Once channels see that the Allstar product lines are successful, they are more likely to sell the product within their channel. Providing the product to them as a discounted package will allow the company to build relationships with each channel. In other words, it will be easier to distribute Allstar products throughout the channels with a positive working relationship. This positive relationship can also be built up with recommendations from doctors. Doctors need to hear the health benefits and how Allstar products will be able to benefit them as well as their patients in the long run. If a doctor prescribes a product and a patient is satisfied, this will reflect well upon the doctor who will now have a trusting relationship with Allstar. At the same time, sales force is a major success factor. Having the appropriate amount of employees in certain sectors is crucial. For example, doctors are educated about products from the detailers so the right amount of detailers is important. Too many or too few might end up hurting the relationship with the doctor. Too few employees may also make production slower and less effective. Too many employees may consume a large amount of the budget that could be allocated more effectively.

I also stayed consistent with my teams marketing plan and recommended that the next market to go into should be the allergy market. This is because the market is small with a growth rate of only 5.3%, however the market penetration is 47.1%. At the same time, the usage rate is high and the price rivalry is low with most of the products priced the same. There are also only two barriers for entry with only one substitute. Most importantly, channel access is easy and customers are fairly familiar with the market.

Lastly, my advice for the assembly of the marketing team was that the team must be able to bounce back and remain innovative in order to continue with push the company forward rather than crumbling under the pressure. In other words, this team must be able to constantly be making decisions, either to correct a mistake or to improve the product. The new management team must be able to work off every member’s strengths. Everyone should be able to bounce ideas off of each other and should be able to learn new aspects of the business that were unknown before. There needs to be research done to determine how to innovate. There are always changing in the market and so management teams but be able to adapt.

Overall, I thought this was a great class and I was happy to be in the group that I was. I took a lot of knowledge out of the coursework that will

Friday, September 6, 2013

Week 10


This week was all about revising our marking plan. I think that my team learned a lot from this because looking over all of the analysis’ we are able to see our mistakes and what can be changed to fix them. Periods 3 through 7 were up and down for us so now we are just trying to get to that consistency level that will make for a successful company, with successful product lines. As of now we were barely meeting the critical success factors, which included symptom relief, relationship with channels and doctors, brand awareness and sales force. I also think that the variable analysis was able to help us a lot in writing the revision memo. It laid out the demand and margins of our products as well as show are expenses. With understanding supply and demand we can hopefully increase our market efficiency to make a bigger impact in the market. The volume, margin, marketing expense and net marketing contribution also allowed us to compare all seven periods to get a better look on our progress. This analysis can be done by comparing values from the previous period or from the beginning period. I think this is helpful because it shows our progression from the start but also shows where we went wrong from start to now.

The Managing metrics article I think was a good read and was basically a more detailed explanation of what should be done in terms of marketing. Our first thing that would come to mind when it comes to business models is that the customer is always first. But the metrics allowed me to better understand by saying a company serves its market by asking:

• Who is the customer?
• What does he, and will he, want?
• Who is the competitor?
• How do we create, communicate and deliver value to this
customer?
• How do we make money in this process?




With a more detailed approach I think that the intended effect will be more easily attainable. I also thought it was interesting in the article when they said that there will be different metrics for each company. I think that its even more impressive than when a company is able to succeed off of their business model just by having an idea of what to go off of. I think that this is a great example of how a marketer is effective.

As of now, I am hoping that our revised plan will help us with Allstar products. We want to reach that point when there is no more regressing in the market. And with metrics it is important to note that allow we might reach that level, we will still have to be constantly adjusting our plan as managers in order for Allstar to remain competitive and innovative.

Friday, August 30, 2013

Pharmasim Decisions


This week was decisions for Pharmasim 3-7 and it was a crucial decision making process for our group because we introduced a new product, Allround+.  This line extension was a 12-hr multi-capsule, children's liquid cold medicine. The children's liquid cold medicine market was chosen because it was attractive with only one other brand competitor. Also, for Allround in period 3, inflation was forecasted to be 3.0%, so prices increased 3.0% which would brought Allround to $5.76.
Ad messaging was changed to 30%, Benefits to 20% and Comparison was decreased to 30% from 40%.  Additionally, the "help you rest" message was changed to "minimize side effects". We thought that it was a more positive message to convey to consumers. With these decisions customer satisfaction seemed to approve of removing alcohol last period, as it is viewed as a side effect, which helped correlate to our new message. However, nothing was changed in the formula this period. Co-Op Advertising was increased from $1.4M to $2.0M just for more support in advertising of Allround and the sales force remained the same. This was a very successful period for us. Revenue was +14%, Gross Margin +13%, Net Income +30%, and the Stock Price increased to $44.46.

For period we increased the price of Allround, based on inflation forecast to $5.85. We then sacrificed some our profit margins for Allround+ and made the price $5.30. This was to gain ground over our competitor, Coldcure, in the market whose price ultimately dropped with ours to $5.29.  At the same time we didn’t alter the sales force, which left us with $36.6M after the report purchases.  So, there was $11.0M for Allround and $25.6M for Allround+, according to the plan.  Then, this was split between ad and promotion.  Then we decided to cut promo spending for Allround in half and then allocate the rest to ads.  This meant that Allround+ was able to have a somewhat higher promotional allowance. Thus, using our  $47.9M budget we allocated $8M to Allround and $18.8M to Allround+, which aligns with our marketing plan. Allround+ now has 30% primary, 20% benefits, 40% compare w/ Coldcure, and 10% reminder. This allowed for Revenue to increase 4%, Gross Margin +4%, Net Income -12%, and the Stock Price dropped to $44.14. Overall, our product is priced well but there is a desire for more coupons. Our brand perception has started to decrease.

For period five for our special decision we chose to do clinical studies to provide evidence of product effectiveness for $4M as well as train the detailers on side effects, drug interactions, and proper usage for $1M. We also needed to reduce budget by $2.5M so we left sales force and promotions the same and ad spend was reduced by $1M for Allround and $1.5M for Allround+. Since inflation was forecasted at -.5%, the price of Allround was reduced. However, we decided to keep the price of Allround+ the same so that we can start to “increase” prices and grow our product. So far these were our most successful decisions as well as our most successful period. Revenue is +4%, Gross Margin +4%, Net Income +5%, and stock price rose to $46.35.




For period 6 our special decision was in regards to Allstar being pitched new advertising vehicles. We decided to place our product in a movie expected to be popular with young adults for $100K as well as run an ad contest to have customers come up with a clever ad run on the web for $1M. We also decided not to start another line extension. The new product Allright did not align with our marketing plan because we did not discuss the allergy market or a nasal spray. At the same time, inflation was forecasted at +2% so we decided to increase the price of Allround to $5.94 as well as raise the price of Allround+ to $5.50. Lastly, lack of consumer promotion for Allround was putting us at a disadvantage and we were running over capacity at the same time. Therefore, some of Allround+'s ad spending was shifted to Allround promotion. Also, primary spending for Allround was increased again to maintain awareness.  At the same time, Allround was given more promotional allowances, since we were losing some shelf space. We these decisions our figures suffered. Revenue was down -3%, Gross Margin -4%, Net Income -9%, and the Stock Price dropped to $41.68. It was said that there were some mixed comments about Allround+ via social media and that our special decision for marketing appealed to a wide variety of groups, but a more focused approach may have been more effective. Prices dropped 1.3% compared to inflation rising 2.1%. Overall, we had our ups and downs this were and we are not in a favorable position going into period seven but there is also a lot of decisions still to be made and we are still trying to grow our lines in their respective markets.





Sunday, August 25, 2013

Marketing Plan Strategy


So this week the strategy of my groups marketing plan was to research different markets to see which are the most penetrable. In our marketing goals there is an emphasis on exploring new markets. I think that it is important to innovate and broaden our company and marketing strategy in order to stay ahead of competition as well as keep our products fresh.

First we looked at the market attractiveness matrix to determine which markets were the most attractive to enter. The cold market, which we already have success in, has the most competitive advantage as well as a highly attractive market. With factors such as a large market size of 329.8 million and a market penetration percentage of 67%, we thought that it would be a good market to enter a new product.

The cough market was also looked at more closely because it was somewhat attractive with a market penetration of 62.9%, low price rivalry, only 2 barriers for entry and only one substitute.

Lastly, we chose children’s cold for all households because of the 675 score on the rubric. Even though there was a small market size, the growth rate is 74.6%. There is also no price rivalry and only one barrier for entry. At the same time the customer familiarity is almost 90%.

The whole point of entering one of these target markets would be to expand Allstar to generate more profit. However, it is also important that we have the same success that we attained with Allround as well as maintain effectiveness. This all comes down to how well we market our product. This may be by coupons or reminders but it is crucial to show the customer the value in our product and why we are better than all competitors.

Friday, August 16, 2013

Evaluations - Week 7

So this week in lecture we talked about metrics to evaluate each team in Pharmasim. The five that I thought to be most important are:

  1. Customer Satisfaction: We are always drilling in Marketing, the fact that the customer is the most important aspect. Their needs, desires, happiness etc.. comes first because ultimately they will be the ones buying your product(s).
  2. Brand Awareness: I think that this proves how well you marketed your product. If it is high then you were able to spread the word and advertise about what you have to offer as well as help to gain more consumers.
  3. Market Share: This is a great measure of competition. It will be able to show who dominates which market and by how much.
  4. Gross Margin: This margin shows the percent total of sales that a company retains after cost of goods sold is retracted. This is important to see how much is actually being retained by the company which will only add to the success of the business.
  5. Units sold: In the end, its all about how much you are selling. High sales=high profits and is a get measure of how well your business is doing. It is a very important factor in other margins as well.
I really wanted to put Brands Perception in here but couldn't get myself to put it on the list. It is a close #5 because I think that your image in the market is very important. At the same time, certain advantages from this measure can be seen in other aspects.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Simulation Incidents - Week 6



This week was tough for me with the little Internet access that I had but my group members were great. So going into period one there was the incident with social media. We had to choose between a website with interactive blog or Facebook and Twitter as well as deciding whether to allocate funds to Google Adwords. Personally, I know that I skip over the advertisements on Facebook and Twitter. Even though the apps are extremely popular, most are on them for their own social networking. It was decided that we would have a full website for our product in order to convey all of the necessary information about it. The safety of consumers is a priority and making sure they know all of the information about the product rather than just seeing a passerby ad is most important. Also, with that website was an interactive blog so that we can constantly update the consumer.

Now going into period two there was an incident with quality assurance. So we could have spent money ($100,000) to dispose of an expiring batch of product or tried to push the product into the market and tried to quickly sell. In this case, the product, if sold, would be less effective due to its nearing expiration and could have hurt the Allround brand image. Therefore, it was decided that we were dispose of the product. Even at the extra cost, in the long run it was the best decision for the company.

This second decision reminded me of something discussed in class, should Blackberry stop pouring its money into its product when it cannot compete with Apple. I just think that Blackberry needs to innovate and find their niche. It is clear with other product such as the Android, Samsung Galaxy and even Nokia have been displaying features in their smart devices that are comparable or even better than features of an iPhone. However, like someone said in class, its all about interconnectibility. Its not a secret and can be seen everywhere you go that the iPhone is dominant in the market. There was a time when a lot of people with Blackberrys had BBM and then Apple took over with imessage. I want to be able to feel like I fit in, when it comes to communicating. I can still remember when all five of my roommates in college had an iPhone and I had one of those phones with no internet. I would get twenty random text messages but with the iPhone I wouldn’t have to leave the screen I was on. 



Overall, we had some ups and downs in the first few decisions of the simulation. At first we thought that pouring some more money into the detailers would help us with connecting to more doctors. However, it caused us to lose market share meaning that in order to gain more support for the product, sending promoters out was not the way to go.  Therefore, to address the health concerns that came along with our product, we dropped the alcohol contained in it. By this time we were still over budget so it was decided to drop the overall advertising budget, get rid of trials, reduce the amount allocated to coupons, and drop the number of mass merchandisers from the sales force. At the same time, the volume discounts for <250 and <2500 were lowered, but we took a 1% increase to both 2500+ and wholesale. This allowed us to be under budget as well as raise our revenue, gross margin, and net income. 


Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Wall Street Journal Risk

Here is a company that is taking a risk!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323997004578640222410029126.html

The head of Uralkali is confident with the company's plans to drop out of the industry's cartel system, which has been used to build the company up and instead pursue a volume-based strategy, making investors very nervous. This would call for lower prices in order to hopefully increase sales volume. This could potentially give the company a leg-up on the competition and drive them from the market. This company is trying to pursue a new business environment of maximum output. Investors fear that the output will exceed the demand but Uralkali assures them that this is the right course of action.

Week 5 - Customer Analysis and Buyer Behavior


I thought that the lecture was interesting this week and pretty helpful when it comes to Pharmasim. I learned more about buyer behavior process or how the customer views value and how that translates to the consumer decision making process. In the video Understanding the Consumer Decision-Making Process, it was said that the consumer decision-making process consists of five steps, which are need recognition, information search, evaluations of alternatives, purchase and post-purchase behavior. So if a customer decides that they actually don’t need the product, they might not buy it. At the same time, in their information search, they could find a product that does the same thing but costs less. These variables are what influences buyer behavior. I also find that if there is an external stimulus, such as a friend around encouraging the purchase, I might be more inclined to buy the product. An example of influence from friends as well as the general culture can be seen in my purchase of an iPhone. In the video Influences on Consumer Buying Decisions, culture (norms to guide our purchase decisions), values (what we place importance on), social class (where we stand in society compared to others based on income, education and occupation), reference groups and opinion leaders all influence our buyer behavior. I was not fitting in with my peers in school because most people had an iPhone. It was normal to have this phone and you were perceived to have money. There was a time where I was in class and the teacher asked the people with iPhones to raise their hands. Another girl and I were the only ones to not raise their hand. Even the teacher’s hand was up. That is when I established a need based on external influences, for this phone.




The first example in class was the process of buying a computer and how lengthy that process can be. There are many factors that customers consider when buying a computer such as price, brand, benefits, features etc. However, there are things that affect and may shorten the buying process. For example, if there is urgency, as mentioned in class, customers might overlook certain things. For example, if my laptop broke and I had a few papers due this week, I would have to get a new computer as fast as possible. Therefore, I might not research a lot into each of my options. This quick decision might lead to cognitive dissonance, which was discussed later in the class. In the video Cognitive Dissonance & Post-Purchase Process, Cognitive dissonance was defined as the uncomfortable tension or feelings that occur when we hold conflicting thoughts, attitudes or beliefs.

A question was asked along the lines of, would pricing products properly, describing products accurately, and providing quality customer service, alleviate cognitive dissonance? I would say no because there are always going to be those people that ask themselves, was this product worth it? Were its flaws worth it? Even if the price was competitive, was it worth it? There are always purchases that I make that I will regret. It’s all about perceived risk, which is something that is always desired to be low. The factors based on this risk can be seen below:




I know that there are computers out there that are of great quality that are made by IBM and Dell as well as other companies but from past experience, I will probably never stray from Apple. I have a brand loyalty to them that will be hard to break. I know that if a Conjoint Analysis was done on me (like on page 153 of Lehmann) and I had to rank laptops by viewing the brand, battery life, and weight of the product, I would be bias. I went through two Dells in high school and both crapped out on me around a year from the purchase date. Then I purchased a Mac Book and I’ve had the same one for the past five years. Therefore, I would excuse the fact that it might not have as long of a battery life or might weigh more, just because it is an Apple computer. It still works perfectly and it gets an emotional rise which is another aspect not always thought about but discussed in class.

This reminds me of the Benefits Ladder in this weeks Chalk Talk. There are companies that use their physical product or services’ attributes to evoke and appeal to not just a functional value but also an emotional one to the customer. Lehmann says focusing on benefits is also important in understanding the competitive set. Benefits are more important than the physical product and also helps define the
competition based on the benefit. “Thus, a key problem facing a marketing manager is to understand what benefits different customer groups or market segments are seeking” (145).


When it comes down to it and you look at model of value creation, at no point does concept of physical attributes come in to play. It’s the benefits or intangibles that are valued.  I’m going to use a product such as Monopoly as an example. When you see the commercials for Monopoly what do you see? You see a family or group of friends getting together and having fun. A person can see this product as a way of getting closer to someone else. It will evoke joy and togetherness among people so I should buy this product. It again goes to show how good marketing can demonstrate value to a customer who was not originally planning on buying that product but now intends to.

Lehmann this week, showed us why customer analysis is so important.  He states on 137 that when talking about a customer “we mean not only current customers of a given product but also both customers of competitors and current noncustomers of the product category (i.e., potential customers). The term customer also refers both to direct (immediate) customers,
i.e., supermarkets and discount stores and critically Wal-Mart for consumer product companies such as P&G and manufacturers for component manufacturers such as Intel, and to final customers/consumers (i.e., individuals and businesses).” The Purchase Intention Survey in Pharmasim can help with this by telling how many intended to buy the product based on its benefits and how many actually bought the product.





In the second half of class and in Section three of the Pharmasim manual, there was a large discussion on Segmentation. It was decided that as a four-hour cold multifunction remedy, All Round is a Mass-market strategy. The mass market provides one product regardless of individual needs and the customer can choose to use it or not. Researching new markets may provide flexibility because currently All Round is mass market focusing on the large market. Now it can look for additional markets to go into. So a new product will be created for the customers who have different needs. An example of this could be seen in the multi-segment. In other words, each segment has a unique need or problem, which separates them into segments. They are based on a common need.

In the competitor analysis section of Pharmasim, I would be able to see how competitors are serving the various needs of customers. My direct competitors are going to be my product form and category competitors (any product exactly like yours or can be substituted for yours). Brand Perception in the simulation is also important because it gives insight to how customers measure effectiveness and
helps to understand evaluation of products. In the end, it comes down to how effective you are at converting buyers to users and retention of the products. This can be measured by satisfaction or post purchase viewing how satisfied people are with the product. Tradeoffs, how people perceive the relationship between value of product as well as value creation or delivered benefits vs. perceived benefits.



Thursday, July 25, 2013

Competiton Analysis - Week 4


This week was the first week without Cohen’s book and although I was missing new Drucker information, his work can still be applied to other aspects of the class as well as Lehmann’s book.

This week was all about competitor analysis, the dangers of it, how to write it, advantages and mapping your competition. To start competitive analysis is research done to discover exactly who the competitors are in the market and their strengths and weaknesses (Lombardo - Foreign and Domestic Business Competition: Definition and Regulations). In other words, this can be where a company finds out what is lacking in their companies product. It leaves room for another company to innovate and offer the customer something that another company cannot. For instance, in class there was a discussion about the Apple iPhone. Apple discovered and made popular a phone with components of other companies that are used everyday. So a PDA, mp3 player/iPod, maybe a video game system and cell phone were all devices that were carried separately and made by various companies. What Apple did was innovate. They were able to see that all of these devices were used on a daily basis and the customer needed an easier way, more compact way to travel with all of them. Differentiation, or a way of spotlighting the differences between competitors, stores or products, is exactly what Apple did. The difference was of value and noticeable to the consumer because there was so much contained in one device, which made it easier for the customer.

 

In the Dangers of Competitor Analysis article, another important point was brought up. There can only be so much emphasis on researching ones competition before you are running in circles. It’s the companies or competitors that you cannot track that are the more important to know about and those are the competitors that don’t exist yet. Just like CCC Information Systems, a company can explode on to the market and surpass even the greatest brands. This takes me back to something said in class. IBM did not even see Apple as a big competitor and now look what has happened. With the innovation of the iPhone and other products, Apple has become a force on the market. Lehmann has also stated that this research of competitors can be seen as a defensive move, in order to sustain the company and make sure valuable information does not fall into the wrong hands (93). Figure 4.1 shows the system for gathering this defensive data (Lehmann 95).






Secondary sources are generally less expensive and easier to obtain than primary data and often cover most of the important questions we need to ask about competitors. This information can be found any where from the Internet to local newspapers to consultants (Lehmann 96). Primary data can be seen as gathering information right from the source such as employees, suppliers, investment bankers, etc.

“At the product level, a marketing strategy can be thought of in terms of three major components: target market selection, core strategy (i.e., positioning and differential advantage), and implementation (i.e., supporting marketing mix)” (Lehmann 112). This is just as important as assessing competitors strategy, both can be easily determined by examining three sources of information: product sales literature, the company’s own sales force, and trade advertising (Lehmann
116).

Included in this is the important task is to assess the technological strategies of the major competitors. This can be done using the following framework of six criteria (Maidique and Patch, 1978):
1. Technology selection or specialization.
2. Level of competence.
3. Sources of capability: internal versus external.
4. R&D investment level.
5. Competitive timing: initiate versus respond.
6. R&D organization and policies. (Lehmann 118)

 

Mapping your competition is also an important task to see where your products compare to others. In order to draw a position map a company must first define the market or cast a wide net of the consumers needs. Next the price should be chosen and the primary benefit determined. This will show where the product compares to other products. For example, if there is a similar product on the market that is of a higher price but lesser value, they have less to offer than your product. Lastly, plot positions and draw the expected-price line. As we can see in the plot below (D’Aveni 114), the iPhone has the highest price but at the same time has the most to offer the consumer. Apple has stayed ahead in markets such as the MP3-player market since October 2001 by giving customers more functionality and additional storage capacity at even lower prices. That has made it tough for competitors like Sony, Dell, and Creative to gain toeholds (D’Aveni 115).







I also found out how to do this in Pharmasim. When I enter the simulation and go to the Tradeoffs tab there is a map of consumers’ perceptions in terms of symptoms relief, price, and value. The plot can show whether or not competitors provide relief and it can also show potential market opportunities or areas that are not being satisfied by a competitor.

A similar way to map your competition is in Figure 2.2 below (Lehmann 34). This shows the general proximity in terms of levels of certain products of competition and how they measure next to each other. Unlike the plot, these products may not be in the same market but they still compete for the customers business. At the same time, the narrowest perspective one can take of competition is
called product form. “These products typically pursue the same market segment, and their features therefore have similar values. As Figure 2.2 shows, from Diet Coke’s perspective, a narrow view of competition would include only diet colas, such as Diet-Rite and Diet Pepsi. These brands appeal to similar consumers: those seeking a cola taste with low calories” (Lehmann 35). This, like the mapping plot, is a narrow view of competition. The second level of Figure 2.2 has similar features of the first level or known as the product category that is thought of as the industry. The third level is deemed generic competition defined as consisting of those products and services fulfilling the same customer need (Lehmann 36).





I thought it was interesting in class when we were talking about established brands such as Coca-Cola and Heinz. They have gained popularity because of their coveted taste. However, if there was a product that was cheaper and of the same quality they would still be the popular brand. As I listened to this, I was thinking how I have specific brands of hair spray and running shoes, and sports equipment, etc that I consistently buy and will always buy because they are brands that I trust. I know that they work so I don’t need to try something else.

Friday, July 19, 2013

Week Three - Market Research


“A lot of people don’t know what they want until you show it to them” – Steve Jobs

This week in the lecture and in the readings, we started out reading about research and industry analysis. I thought the talk in Cohen about the release of the IBM personal computer was very interesting because it made me think back to when my brother was in college. He attended Umass starting in 2001 and I still remember lugging his desktop computer screen and modem tower up the stairs of his building. Its amazing to see how far we have come because my freshman year in 2009, it was the norm to have a laptop. In eight years there was a transition from floppy drives to CD drives. That just goes to prove the genius behind new technologies and products because there was a need for something more portable than a modem tower and large monitor with a keyboard and mouse.

In the lecture, it was stated how only five percent of new products succeed and therefore most companies will focus on improving their existing products. They stick with what they know because straying is risky. Without developing new products, they at the same time have to figure out how to increase profits and therefore have to get more out of a smaller budget. This is an important aspect of marketing. How do we handle what we need to under these budget constraints?

Sometimes to handle the budget constraints a business must not reveal the possible negatives about a business. My question about dishonesty was actually answered in class. I thought that fast food and cigarettes were a great example of businesses having to market a product that is potentially harmful. However, these companies try to highlight the positives of their product because any time research is done to determine the customer values, it’s an extra expenses. So it wouldn’t make sense if all you are going to do is be dishonest after spending money and it could affect company’s brand.

I think Jacob gave a great example in his blog for week 2. He stated that JC Penny advertises the same looking products at Macy’s for a cheaper price. However, Macy’s advertises that it is a place you will go and be treated like a friend would treat you. This is a quality that is valued by customers because it shows that Macy’s cares what the customer thinks/wants even though prices are higher.

It’s all about category attractiveness. “The three main areas of inquiry include basic aggregate factors, category factors related to the major participants, and environmental factors” (Lehmann 63). Figure 3.1 below is the Category Attractiveness Summary.




For aggregate factors usually larger markets are better than smaller ones and offer better opportunity. Also the current market growth as well as projected growth is an important factor when determining the market. Fast growing categories are preferred. At the same time, there could be interyear variation in demand that occurs. With attempts to develop new products and acquire other businesses, this could be desirably eliminated (Lehmann 65-67).

Category factors are more used to assess the structure of industries. This includes competition and rivalry, pressure from substitutes, relationships with suppliers/buyers, and the threat of new entrants. Lastly, environmental factors contribute to the category’s sensitivity.

Projected growth is an important factor to know and can also be know as Sales Forecasting. A good forecast takes into account four major categories of
variables: customer behavior, past and planned
company actions and strategies, competitor actions, and the environment. At the same time, forecasts are used in several ways:
1.     To answer “what if” questions.
2.     To help set budgets.
3.     To provide a basis for a monitoring system.
4.     To aid in production planning.
5.     By financial analysts to value a company.
 (Lehmann 215-216).

In other words, forecasting is an educated guess, a projection of how the market will fall and the resulting sales. There are several different models for sales forecasting but basically a model is specified indicating the form of the relation between the independent variables and sales. Most often the nature of the relationship is linear, such as:
Sales = b0 + b1(our price) + b2
(competitors’ prices) + b3 (our advertising) +  b4 (competitors’ advertising) + b5 (disposable income)

(Lehmann 231).

Oddly enough after all this talk about PCs, models and new products, Drucker was one to value the human brain as the best research for marketing. As Cohen stated, the problem was attempting to quantify the nonquantifiable (Cohen 155).  Some important nonquantifiable factors would be ignored, which could lead to incorrect or poor decisions. Drucker concluded:
·      If it’s not yet on the market, don’t do the market research in order to not give certain details away about your product. This could give an advantage to competitors.
·      Expert opinion is of limited value because only hindsight can tell us if they are right or wrong. (it is my personal belief that experts are important because they are trained to know more and be more skilled than others in their field. Yes, they can be wrong but they can also give a company insight).
·      You must understand the risks and the importance of the test of reality. The reality test could be something that can not be measured quantitatively but can be an important factor that goes unrealized unless tested.
·      It’s the customer that defines the product (or service). CUSTOMER IS THE MOST IMPORTANT MARKETING FACTOR. (I think this is the theme of the class haha).
·      There are three kinds of information that all researchers need (Inside, across organizations, and external). This will give the best sense of the market because it hands you information from all aspects.
·      You need to know what to emphasize when researching the customer. In other words, you need to know what they value. In class it was stated that you also need to know what other products lack and a possible solution for that when instituting a new product (Cohen 156).


Drucker also thought that when it came to demographics, which help determine what the customer values, you have to exploit the changes. “There is much more to demographics than the size of the population, and these other aspects of demographics can be even more important. They include age structure, ethnic composition, employment, education, and income” (Cohen 164). After analyzing these subgroups, a detailed profile of the characteristics of the members is created. They are then incorporated into the marketing strategy and then used to develop a marketing plan (Cohen 164). However, demographics change and marketers must adjust to keep up with relevant products. Drucker had a different way of analyzing demographics to use for marketing. “Drucker’s process was to observe events that have occurred, to reason to logical conclusions as to results, and then to seek opportunities in the competitive advantage of having this knowledge” (Cohen 168).

Whether, Drucker’s method was agreed upon is debated but it is no secret that he was a great predictor of market events.

I would think that Aleena’s job is very difficult as I see her blog post example of her customer base. She states, “Our customers are countries (or, more specifically, governments) and not individuals or even companies.  Although we most likely have to do plenty of marketing research in terms of keeping up-to-date with emerging technologies and keeping our eyes on competitors (especially when trying to win a contract), our customers tell us their needs outright (although, what they 'need' and what we can actually do are two different things).” I would think that because there are more demographics to analyze, business would be more difficult but she proved me wrong. This goes to show the absolute importance of communication with the customer.

One last thing to point out: I learned something new in Pharmasim from the lecture. 
How to find people who reside in market place:
Go to "brands purchased survey" – click on brand Allround period zero
The markets units purchased is 511.4 million units purchased in the marketplace

The market demand – current number of users units they would purchase
therefore, 112 million sold of the 511.4
 
Then to decompose – or the amount of people you would find in market place
Divide by average units purchased found in decision criteria
511.4/2.7 units per year – people that reside in marketplace

how to figure out all the people that don’t use product –
calculate market penetration – 64.2%
511.4/64.2 = total market


Thursday, July 11, 2013

Total Marketing Approach - Week 2


Marketing Planning – Marketing as a process at the business center level

It is clear that the development of a written marketing plan is crucial to every business. This plan will be directed at one or more products and possibly improve both coordination and performance. Just as Drucker said, if you market well, selling is unnecessary. Therefore, with the right marketing plan, performance is sure to improve. It is also important to note that the use of a mission statement is important and labeled, “the foundation of marketing” in the Business Plans video. It is a quick way of getting organizational goals across to the customer, showing that the marketing is geared towards them.


"Typically executives spent, on average, 45 days each year on planning, relying most heavily on information from the sales force, management information systems, and internal marketing research” (Lehmann 1). Also, there are two general parts that the marketing plan is divided into:
1.     Situation analysis, which analyzes the background of the market for the product.
2.     The objectives, strategy, and programs based on the background analysis that direct the firm’s actions (Lehmann 1).

This is the typical structure for a marketing plan:
            I. Executive Summary
            II. Situation Analysis
                        A. Category/competitor definition
                        B. Category analysis
                        C. Company and competitor analysis
                        D. Customer analysis
                        E. Planning assumptions
            III. Objectives
            IV. Product/Brand Strategy
            V. Supporting Marketing Programs
            VI. Financial Documents
            VII. Monitors and Controls
            VIII. Contingency Plans

(Lehmann 13).

In other words, research must be done first to determine the needs of the customer (most important marketing factor) and then the action plan is compiled. This structure is a more complicated view than Drucker’s five questions which all pertain to the Total Marketing Approach. The questions are: 1. What is our mission? 2. Who is our customer? 3. What does our customer value? 4. What are our results? 5. What is our plan? (Cohen 30).

More specifically, to develop a marketing plan, a S.W.O.T. analysis must be conducted. S.W.O.T. stands for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (Competitive Advantage video). This will be the research needed to move forward in creating strategies and actions.

While there may be a plan for one or several products, the length of time for each varies. Basically, marketing plans change because the consumers’ interests/needs are seasonal. A past study showed most marketing plans are around one year as compared to strategic plans, which have a longer time horizon of three to five years. This statement in Lehmann’s book (Analysis for Marketing Planning) reminded me of how Drucker said how important innovation is to marketing. It is important to adjust to the changing times and be able to adapt to market the strongest product. For example, the impact of the Internet on marketing cause a need for the assumptions underlying the plan to be checked frequently and the data constantly updated throughout the planning cycle (Lehmann 3).

At the same time, Lehmann mentioned something that I thought was interesting and very important to marketing. What I heard from Drucker was that the customer is the most important factor in marketing but at the same time Lehmann points out the importance of competitor orientation. It is important to mold to the customer but also be better than the competition.

For the planning process I learned that the marketing plan is a limited cycle of continuous tasks. There is no beginning or ending to the planning process (Lehmann 10). There are two general approaches to planning:
1.     Top-down planning: the marketing plans are formulated by either senior or middle management with the aid of staff and product management and then implemented by the latter.
2.     Bottom-up planning: the lower ranks down to field salespeople are actively involved in the planning process through collecting competitor and customer information and making forecasts. The information is subject to higher-level review, but lower-management personnel play key roles in the process” (Lehmann 10).

Personally, I think that bottom-up planning is the way to go because it is the salesmen that are doing the legwork in the field. They are the ones that know what the customer want and will be more effective in marketing to them. I also think that this helps to clarify Drucker’s view in chapter four because he was talking about how marketing is beyond a function in a company. I can see now what he was talking about because since everyone has input or is somehow involved in the process, then marketing is a commitment.

A marketing plan can easily fail if some standards are not met. There needs to be enough analysis/research on the customers desires to be able to market to what they want and to provide sufficient strategies. It is also important to have a structured written plan in order to keep employees in line and have a template of actions that are necessary. At the same time, marketing plan is something that needs to be planned and executed by and for the employees of the company. Proper managers must be put in charge and rewarded based on attainment of objectives. The speed and the length of the plan are also important. Not too fast or slow as well as a balanced length is crucial. Lastly, reevaluation or changing of the plan must not be done too much because employees may have a hard time adjusting, which would affect product performance (Lehmann 6-7).

As I said earlier, it is important to have the right managers leading the marketing plan. Drucker believed that good leadership is essentially marketing (Drucker 39). With proper leadership, a manager is able to better implement the plan to be followed by employees. An effective leader will be able to do most of the things on this list:
1.     Maintain absolute integrity. 2. Know your stuff. 3. Declare your expectations. 4. Show uncommon commitment. 5. Expect positive results. 6. Take care of your people. 7. Put duty before self. 8. Get out in front. (Cohen 41). 

These qualities also do not necessarily require schooling. Most are learned by experiences outside of the classroom such as military service. I thought it was shocking that some may not know that interviewers are secretly looking for these qualities to be able to do a certain job. It makes me wonder if all my schooling is worth it.

Friday, July 5, 2013

What is Marketing? - Week 1

-->
What is marketing? I would have explained it as selling a product to the consumer and would have been wrong. Jennifer Lombardo in the Introduction to Marketing Video, stated that marketing is not just personal selling or even just advertising. Marketing includes activities such as public relations, sales promotion, advertising, social media, pricing, distribution and many other functions. In other words, marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners and society at large to be able to satisfy the consumer (video).

As I dove into this weeks readings and lectures, I found that first of all, Drucker who is deemed the “world’s most influential business thinker” got me thinking. William A. Cohen, who is describing Drucker’s views, gave me a different view on marketing and business.  He first taught me that although Drucker did not use the approach of different eras of marketing development, they still exist in his mind. Drucker believed more in the power of people and adaptive nature rather than letting the economic etc. forces determine periods of time.

The craftsman and simple trade era was basically a manufacturer, a craftsman, trading something he made for something he wanted. This reminds me of a real life story of my grandma baking me apple pies in the summer to get me to come and paint or clean or do something around her house.

Another era was the production era, which arose with the innovation of technology. Technology allowed things to be made in bulk at a faster rate than ever before. The selling era was all based on the knowledge of selling a product. It's great to know what the product is but it's even better to buy the product with a sense of its benefits.

The marketing era was an interesting time for the U.S. because unlike other lands that had been destroyed by WWII, the U.S. was intact. There was a competitive advantage where techniques of analysis were developed to determine the needs of the consumer. This helped manufacturers understand the market so that a specified product could be produced. This brought Cohen to a very important point that reminds me of the Marketing Orientation Video that stated that not all businesses followed the correct orientation of: function, process and philosophy. Drucker said, “Even today, some do not understand that marketing is not simply a sophisticated way of speaking about selling” (5).

This reminded me of Jennifer Lombaro explaining how a company determines their marketing policy, which is usually deciding how to harness their internal strengths to reach their consumers. To create the organizational marketing process, companies usually choose from four philosophies including production, sales, marketing and societal marketing. This will determine how successful a business will be as well as their overall understanding of marketing to be able to reach the consumer.

This led to a discussion on Drucker’s views and how marketing is differentiated from selling. He believed that selling was persuading someone to buy something that you had and wanted to sell while marketing was having something that a prospect already wanted to buy (5). In other words, if I wanted specifically a new Polo hat, I would go online or go into a store and buy it. No one would need to persuade me to buy it because I already want it. Drucker brought up a good point that if marketing were done perfectly, selling would unnecessary and marketing and selling may be opposing each other (5).

The marketing era is clearly the era (although he did not believe) that suits Drucker the best. He notes that all business depends on only two functions: marketing and broad innovation. He wrote that marketing “is the whole business seen from the point of view of the final result, that it, from the customer’s point of view. Concern and responsibility for marketing must therefore permeate all areas of the enterprise” (5). Basically, what really matters is that the customer’s needs are met. Product development is all about supply and demand. What the customer receives at the end of the cycle determines satisfaction, feedback, and innovative methods. As the Marketing Orientation Video stated, a satisfied customer is three times more likely to return.

Drucker also says that it is the creation of the customer, not the profit that creates a business (6). I thought that this made perfect sense because a business would not receive any profits without the customer, even though profit is very important. In other words, he believes that the process of profit maximization is dangerous because it suggests that you could save any business by maximizing profit margins (12).




Drucker also believes that there are issues with the profit motive. Meaning that there are plenty of people out there that are not motivated by money and are happy with their lives such as volunteer firefighters. Most people just want to be treated with respect and do what they love rather than put an emphasis on high pay. This concept of the profit motive in turn causes hostility to profits, which Drucker deems “the most dangerous disease of an industrial society” (15). What needs to be emphasized is the importance of a business making a profit rather than profit maximization. Profit allows a company to stay in business and allows innovation and marketing. However, with the want to constantly increase profits, the customer is no longer taken into account and the consumer’s needs are no longer met (mistakes are made) (16). A poor understanding of marketing leads to several mistakes that hinder business (Marketing Orientation Video)

Drucker, on the other hand, saw the history of marketing as a series of catalysts rather than eras. The first catalyst of course was the creation of marketing in 1650 by providing a large variety of product rather than focusing and perfecting a single product. However, it was not until the 1940s that a product was truly marketed, done by Cadillac (7). What I thought was interesting was that Drucker believed that abandoning modern production methods such as Fords assembly line, there would be major marketing advantages. I guess I just saw Ford’s production line as a way to quickly produce something but I think that Drucker believes that there needs to be a range of products or diversity in a business to have a true advantage.

Therefore, I learned that marketing is crucial to all businesses, it can be found beyond the U.S., it is preferred to be recognized as developed through critical events, and that it was systematically studied for a framework to be created.

In chapter three, Cohen stated that he struggled with some of Druckers' recommendations on marketing and I too felt the same. However, as I really read into his implications, I started to see the validity. I think that this book will be an interesting read.